The Fraud ArchiveThe Fraud Archive
Back to Home
Affinity / Religious Fraud

Dave Cooper and the $1.4 Billion Oil Fraud in the LDS Community

He sold oil wells to the faithful as if they were a ministry. By the time the numbers broke, the fraud had spread across the American West and hollowed out one of the largest affinity scams ever aimed at Latter-day Saint communities.

2005 - 2015Americas2005–2015

Quick Facts

Period
2005 - 2015
Region
Americas
Key Figures
David Cooper, Harry Markopolos, LDS-affiliated investors +2 more

Key Figures

The Story

This narrative combines documented history with dramatized scenes for storytelling purposes.

Timeline

WFG Begins Targeting Faith-Based Investors

**2005-01** — According to later public allegations, the oil-and-gas investment operation associated with David Cooper began taking shape during the mid-2000s. The structure relied on LDS social networks across the Mountain West, where referrals and church-connected trust lowered resistance to the pitch.

First Investor Money Enters the Program

**2006-06** — The scheme’s early cash flow began with initial commitments from church-affiliated investors who were told they were buying into oil and gas opportunities. Early payments and updates helped create social proof inside the network.

Referral Chain Spreads Through LDS Communities

**2007-03** — As early participants told friends and family, the operation expanded through wards and local relationships. The sales process depended less on public advertising than on trusted introductions and the belief that insiders had already vetted the opportunity.

Underlying Business Claims Come Under Strain

**2008-09** — By this point, the alleged mismatch between promised returns and actual oil-and-gas performance had become harder to hide. The maintenance burden increased as documents, explanations, and distributions had to be generated to keep investors calm.

Regulatory Attention Intensifies

**2009-02** — Federal scrutiny began to harden around the WFG allegations as complaints and investigative material accumulated. Public reporting described the matter as a large affinity fraud directed at LDS investors, increasing pressure on the operation.

Collapse Pressure Reaches the Core

**2009-12-10** — By the time the scheme was publicly unraveling, redemption pressure and investor questions had made continuation unsustainable. The collapse phase marked the shift from private doubt to visible failure.

Civil Enforcement Moves Forward

**2010-01** — Authorities pursued the case as a major securities fraud involving fictitious investments and affinity targeting. The action shifted the matter from rumors of bad performance to a documented enforcement event.

Public Allegations Name the Scheme

**2010-02** — The case became publicly legible as an alleged fraud rather than a private business failure. Investors and community members now had a formal narrative that explained the losses as deception.

Cooper Faces Federal Case Pressure

**2010-03** — As the legal process advanced, the defendant came under sustained investigative and litigation pressure. The public record framed the matter as a large affinity fraud rather than an isolated misstatement.

Court Proceedings Focus on Investor Losses

**2011-06** — Legal proceedings and related documentation centered on the magnitude of losses and the mechanics of the alleged misrepresentations. The case illustrated how community trust had been converted into capital.

Sentencing and Civil Remedies Proceed

**2012-09** — The case moved into the phase where penalties, restitution, and asset tracing became the main questions. As in many fraud cases, recovery prospects remained uncertain and likely incomplete.

Legacy of the Fraud Settles Into the Record

**2015-12** — By the end of the era, the case stood as a cautionary example of religious affinity fraud and investor vulnerability. The public record preserved it as one of the largest such schemes aimed at LDS communities.

Sources

  • regulatory_guidance
    SEC Affinity Fraud investor alert

    Explains the mechanics of affinity fraud and why community trust is exploited.

  • regulatory_guidance
    SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy: Affinity Fraud

    Investor alert describing affinity fraud warning signs.

  • doj_press_release
    Justice Department press release archive on securities fraud prosecutions

    United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Utah archive for fraud-related prosecutions.

  • court_document
    SEC complaint and enforcement materials search

    SEC litigation releases archive; useful for tracing the complaint and related enforcement action.

  • journalism
    Wall Street Journal coverage of LDS affinity fraud in the West

    Relevant enterprise reporting on affinity fraud in Mormon communities and western states.

  • journalism
    The New York Times reporting on affinity fraud and Utah investors

    Background reporting on religious-affinity investment fraud in the Mountain West.

  • journalism
    ProPublica investigative coverage of affinity fraud dynamics

    Useful for contextualizing the social mechanics of community-based investment fraud.

  • journalism
    Bloomberg reporting on energy-investment fraud and investor losses

    Context for oil-and-gas promotion schemes and securities enforcement.

  • secondary_analysis
    Harvard Business School case materials on affinity fraud

    Analytical background on trust exploitation and social-network targeting.

Explore Related Archives

Financial fraud has toppled companies, entangled governments, and exploited trust across borders. Explore the broader context through our sister archives.