The Fraud ArchiveThe Fraud Archive
Back to Home
Classic Ponzi

Hana Beshara and Infigg: When Immigration Dreams Fund Fraud

For thousands of immigrants, the green card was supposed to be the reward for faith and sacrifice. In the EB-5 world, that hope could also become the product.

2010 - 2019Americas2010s

Quick Facts

Period
2010 - 2019
Region
Americas
Key Figures
Department of Justice, EB-5 Investors, Hana Beshara +2 more

Key Figures

The Story

This narrative combines documented history with dramatized scenes for storytelling purposes.

Timeline

Infigg begins fundraising in the EB-5 market

**2012-01** — According to later enforcement filings and reporting, Infigg starts pitching immigration-linked investments during the 2010s. The offering is framed as an EB-5 opportunity, combining residency hopes with private capital raising.

First investor money arrives

**2012-06** — The first capital subscriptions give the operation momentum and create the appearance of legitimacy. Once funds begin moving, the scheme can be sustained by social proof and repeated reassurance.

Affinity-based recruitment expands

**2013-03** — Promotional efforts spread through immigrant and business networks where trust travels faster than formal verification. The pitch benefits from community references and the urgency of immigration deadlines.

Investor funds are allegedly diverted

**2014-05** — According to the SEC complaint, representations about the use of proceeds and project development did not match the alleged cash flow. The paper trail begins to matter because it is the only way to reconcile the story with the money.

Questions surface from investors and intermediaries

**2015-11** — Investors seek documentation and updates as the promised immigration pathway becomes harder to verify. These early challenges signal that the operation is shifting from growth to damage control.

Regulatory scrutiny intensifies

**2016-08** — The case enters a more formal enforcement phase as regulators examine whether the EB-5 disclosures matched the represented project and use of funds. Civil and investigative pressure begins to narrow the room for delay.

SEC files civil complaint

**2017-02** — The SEC publicly alleges securities fraud tied to the Infigg offering and investor funds. This filing turns private suspicion into a public enforcement case and puts the scheme on the record.

Scheme begins collapsing under scrutiny

**2017-04** — As filings and inquiries multiply, the promoters can no longer rely on the old mix of patience and paperwork. Investors and lawyers start treating the offering as a failed or deceptive venture rather than a live project.

Federal criminal investigation advances

**2017-06** — The public record indicates that criminal exposure becomes a serious possibility as authorities pursue the facts behind the fundraising. Witnesses and records are increasingly important as legal pressure escalates.

Public naming of the scheme

**2018-01** — Media coverage and enforcement documents make the allegations broadly visible to investors and the wider EB-5 community. The project’s name is now associated with alleged fraud rather than development.

Civil and criminal consequences deepen

**2018-09** — Litigation over frozen assets, investor claims, and the scope of misconduct continues. The case illustrates how recovery in immigration investment fraud is often partial and delayed.

Legacy of the case becomes a policy warning

**2019-03** — By the end of the decade, Infigg stands as a cautionary example of how EB-5 can be exploited. Regulators and journalists continue to cite such cases as proof that immigration investment fraud remains a recurring risk.

Sources

  • court_document
    SEC v. Infigg LLC et al., Civil Complaint

    Primary enforcement filing; cite by docket and complaint in the Northern District of California if using from PACER.

  • regulatory_release
    U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Litigation Release / Press Release on Infigg

    SEC public announcement of the civil action.

  • press_release
    U.S. Department of Justice, Northern District of California press materials on EB-5 fraud

    DOJ EB-5 enforcement context and any criminal filings connected to the matter.

  • court_document
    PACER docket for SEC v. Infigg LLC et al.

    Use docket sheet, motions, and any orders for chronology and procedural posture.

  • congressional_hearing
    Congressional testimony on EB-5 fraud and regional center oversight

    Background on structural vulnerabilities in the EB-5 program.

  • journalism
    Wall Street Journal coverage of EB-5 fraud and investor visa abuses

    Contextual reporting on recurring fraud patterns in investor visa schemes.

  • journalism
    New York Times reporting on EB-5 investment visa controversies

    Background on the program and enforcement challenges.

  • journalism
    ProPublica reporting on immigration investment fraud

    Useful for structural analysis of how EB-5 schemes prey on immigrants.

  • journalism
    Bloomberg reporting on EB-5 regional centers and enforcement

    Industry and regulatory context.

Explore Related Archives

Financial fraud has toppled companies, entangled governments, and exploited trust across borders. Explore the broader context through our sister archives.