The Fraud ArchiveThe Fraud Archive
Back to Home
Crypto Fraud

PlusToken: The $6 Billion Chinese Crypto Scam

A wallet app sold as a shortcut to effortless crypto profits became a machine for moving tens of billions of yuan in and out of China—until the money stopped arriving, the exits clogged, and the architecture of trust collapsed into the largest Ponzi scheme the crypto world had seen.

2018 - 2019Asia2018–2019

Quick Facts

Period
2018 - 2019
Region
Asia
Key Figures
Chen Bo, Chinese Public Security Authorities, Harry Markopolos +2 more

Key Figures

The Story

This narrative combines documented history with dramatized scenes for storytelling purposes.

Timeline

PlusToken is launched

**2018-05** — The wallet app and investment platform begins circulating in Chinese crypto communities, promising arbitrage-style profits and referral rewards. Its early design blends fintech language with social recruiting, allowing it to look like a legitimate product before regulators or journalists fully focus on it.

Early investor payouts fuel word-of-mouth growth

**2018-07** — The scheme begins paying some participants, which helps create social proof and reduces suspicion among newer users. Screenshots, chat-group recommendations, and local promoter networks accelerate deposits across regional circles.

Referral-driven recruitment expands across Chinese-language channels

**2018-10** — Promoters and affiliates push the app through group chats, in-person introductions, and online communities, making recruitment a key engine of growth. The platform's apparent success becomes its strongest sales tool as users invite friends and relatives.

Blockchain investigators identify unusual wallet flows

**2019-03** — Analysts tracking on-chain activity notice large-scale transfers associated with PlusToken-linked addresses. The movement of funds suggests the operation is not just paying users but also dispersing assets at a scale consistent with a major fraud.

Whistleblowers and observers warn of unsustainable returns

**2019-06** — Independent analysts and concerned users flag the unusually high yields and recruitment dependence behind the platform. Public skepticism grows, but the scheme continues to attract deposits as earlier payouts and social proof keep doubts at bay.

Withdrawal problems spread among users

**2019-07** — Participants begin reporting difficulty accessing funds, and the platform's public credibility deteriorates quickly. The delay in withdrawals marks the first broad sign that the cash-flow engine is failing.

Chinese authorities arrest alleged PlusToken operators

**2020-06** — Police detain core figures associated with the scheme after building a case around the wallet platform, its promoters, and its fund flows. The arrests mark the transition from alleged fraud to formal criminal enforcement.

Charges and prosecution reports become public

**2020-11** — Chinese court and prosecutor reporting describes the case as a massive illegal fundraising and fraud operation. The scheme is publicly identified as a major Ponzi-style crime, ending any remaining ambiguity about its status.

Court proceedings begin to crystallize the record

**2021-01** — Public reporting on the Chinese cases and related proceedings provides a more stable account of the defendants, the scale of the losses, and the government’s seizures. The legal process begins to replace rumor with documentary evidence.

Convictions and sentences are reported

**2021-09** — Chinese media and court reporting indicate that several defendants have been convicted and sentenced in connection with PlusToken. The punishments establish criminal liability, even as victims continue to face uncertain recovery.

Asset recovery efforts continue through seized crypto liquidation

**2022-03** — Authorities continue handling crypto assets linked to the fraud, including the sale or management of seized tokens in the public record. Recovery remains partial, and the scale of restitution lags far behind the scale of losses.

PlusToken is widely recognized as a benchmark crypto fraud

**2024-01** — By this point, the case is routinely cited by investigators and journalists as one of the largest Ponzi schemes in crypto history. It remains a cautionary example of how mobile-first marketing and opaque cross-border transfers can hide a vast theft in plain sight.

Sources

Explore Related Archives

Financial fraud has toppled companies, entangled governments, and exploited trust across borders. Explore the broader context through our sister archives.